Artigos

Int J Obes (Lond). 2026 Jul 11. doi: 10.1038/s41366-026-02163-7. Online ahead of print.NO ABSTRACTPMID:42436264 | DOI:10.1038/s41366-026-02163-7

Phlebology. 2026 Jul 10:2683555261469647. doi: 10.1177/02683555261469647. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare metabolic status and biochemical indices associated with cardiovascular risk, including the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, triglyceride-glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI), and atherogenic lipid indices, between obese individuals with and without lipedema, and to evaluate the potential effect of lipedema on these parameters.Materials and MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 70 obese patients diagnosed with lipedema and 70 obese control individuals without lipedema. Fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were recorded. Based on these parameters, the TyG index, TyG-BMI, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), atherogenic coefficient (AC), and Castelli risk indices I (CRI-I) and II (CRI-II) were calculated.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between the lipedema and control groups in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride levels, TyG, TyG-BMI, or atherogenic lipid indices (all p > .05). LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the lipedema group compared with the control group (p = .008). In the lipedema group, TyG-BMI showed a positive correlation with age and BMI, whereas no significant associations were found with symptom duration or pain severity.ConclusionAlthough LDL-cholesterol levels were lower in obese individuals with lipedema, this difference was not reflected in biochemical indices associated with metabolic status and cardiovascular risk. Importantly, metabolic parameters in patients with lipedema accompanied by obesity were comparable to those observed in individuals with obesity alone, suggesting that obesity rather than lipedema may be a more important determinant of metabolic risk in this population. Therefore, metabolic evaluation should not be overlooked in patients with lipedema, and the management of obesity should be considered in treatment planning.PMID:42431189 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261469647

Front Glob Womens Health. 2026 Jun 24;7:1833913. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2026.1833913. eCollection 2026.ABSTRACTLipedema is a chronic adipose tissue condition that primarily affects women. Despite increasing recognition of lipedema, the condition remains poorly understood and lacks standardized diagnostic criteria or confirmatory tests. Variability in definitions and measurement across clinical and research settings impedes comparability across studies, constraining the evidence base needed to support future advances in clinical practice and patient care. To address challenges associated with inconsistent definitions and data collection, the Lipedema Foundation (LF) partnered with clinicians, researchers, and biostatisticians to develop a Lipedema Common Case Report Form (CCRF). The CCRF was designed to be a research data harmonization tool and is not intended to define diagnostic standards or guide clinical treatment decisions. Its development involved review of published lipedema clinical guidelines and collaborative work to define data elements and attributes for inclusion. When they existed, validated or standardized measures were incorporated directly. When no suitable standardized measures were available, an iterative and collaborative process was used to develop lipedema-specific Common Data Elements (CDEs). The initial version of the CCRF was piloted in participants with and without lipedema, and updates based on participant and clinician feedback were incorporated into the CCRF. A biostatistical review evaluated data completeness, quality, and structure, leading to additional refinements. The final Version 1 instrument consists of 682 CDEs organized into four classifications: (1) Core, (2) Supplemental Highly Recommended, (3) Supplemental, and (4) Exploratory. The current version is prepared for dissemination in the field. By disseminating the CCRF broadly and encouraging adoption in all lipedema research beginning in 2026, including all newly initiated LF-funded projects, LF intends to evaluate its use with grantees and iterate systematically to achieve consistent and comparable data collection. The CCRF provides a structured framework for harmonized data collection that may facilitate comparability across studies and support future development of standardized diagnostic and research methodologies.PMID:42422575 | PMC:PMC13342235 | DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1833913

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-026-06116-3. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION: Recent research suggests that body contouring surgeries may reduce benzodiazepine (BNZ) use in patients with anxiety or depressive disorders. This study explores whether similar benefits occur in women with lipedema-a chronic adipose disorder causing pain, limited mobility, and psychological distress-who are often prescribed BNZ.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study on 100 adult female patients with Stage I-III lipedema undergoing tumescent or water-assisted liposuction between 2019 and 2024. All participants were on stable BNZ therapy for at least six months before surgery. The primary outcome was BNZ usage at six months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included anxiety (GAD-7), pain (VAS), sleep quality (PSQI), and body image (BODY-Q) and assessed pre- and post-surgery using validated instruments.DISCUSSION: At six months, 77% of patients reduced or discontinued BNZ (32% stopped entirely), with average daily dosage decreasing from 3.2 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 1.2 mg (p < 0.001). Statistically significant improvements were also observed in anxiety, pain, sleep quality, and body image (all p < 0.001). Reductions in BNZ use correlated with improvements in pain (r = 0.56), anxiety (r = 0.47), and body image (r = – 0.52). Only minor complications occurred (8%), and no major adverse events were reported.CONCLUSION: Liposuction for lipedema not only improves physical symptoms but also supports psychological recovery, reducing dependence on benzodiazepines. These findings highlight the potential of surgical treatment as part of an integrated approach to managing chronic conditions with both somatic and mental health components. Further research is needed to confirm long-term effects and underlying mechanisms.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Level I, therapeutic study using a properly randomized controlled trial. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .PMID:42420665 | DOI:10.1007/s00266-026-06116-3

Front Cell Dev Biol. 2026 Jun 17;14:1809914. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2026.1809914. eCollection 2026.ABSTRACTLipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterised by disproportionate accumulation of subcutaneous fat within specific anatomical depots, most commonly the lower extremities, with relative sparing of the trunk. Despite increasing clinical recognition, the mechanisms underlying the selective vulnerability of particular adipose depots and the progressive tissue remodelling observed in lipedema remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence suggests that lipedema is associated with complex alterations in adipocyte biology, adipose stem and progenitor cell (ASPC) function, immune signalling, vascular integrity, extracellular matrix remodelling, and lymphatic homeostasis, indicating that the disease extends beyond simple fat accumulation. Recent advances in adipose tissue biology have demonstrated that adipose depots are not functionally uniform structures, but rather anatomically distinct cellular ecosystems with unique developmental origins, transcriptional programs, stromal composition, immune niches, and metabolic properties. These depot-specific characteristics may provide an important framework for understanding the regional distribution and progression of lipedema. However, while substantial progress has been made in defining differences between visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, heterogeneity between individual subcutaneous depots remains comparatively underexplored despite its likely relevance to disorders of regional adipose expansion. The emergence of single-cell and spatial transcriptomic technologies has transformed the study of adipose tissue by enabling high-resolution mapping of adipocytes, stromal populations, vascular cells, and immune microenvironments within healthy and diseased tissue. These approaches offer an unprecedented opportunity to investigate depot-specific cellular states, intercellular signalling networks, and spatial tissue architecture in lipedema. In this review, we synthesise current evidence regarding tissue remodelling and adipose depot heterogeneity in lipedema and examine how single-cell and spatial omics approaches may advance mechanistic understanding of disease pathophysiology. We further discuss current technical and conceptual limitations within the field and highlight future directions for developing integrated adipose tissue atlases capable of identifying disease-driving cellular programs and therapeutic targets in lipedema.PMID:42388970 | PMC:PMC13319045 | DOI:10.3389/fcell.2026.1809914

Phlebology. 2026 Jul 2:2683555261467340. doi: 10.1177/02683555261467340. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTObjectivesGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) models capable of producing photorealistic medical images are increasingly proposed for patient education, clinical illustration, and trainee instruction. However, their ability to accurately represent anatomically distinct disease subtypes remains unclear. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a widely used generative AI model in producing images corresponding to the five anatomical lipedema types defined by the Schmeller classification.MethodsIn this prospective audit, ChatGPT’s image-generation interface was prompted to create 60 images for each lipedema type (Types I-V),yielding 300 images. Prompts were standardized and limited to the subtype label without additional descriptors. Two clinicians independently classified each image into one of the five lipedema types or as indeterminate, blinded to the original prompt; disagreements were resolved by a third clinician. Diagnostic performance was assessed using a confusion matrix and per-type sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value (NPV),F1-score,and one-vs-rest receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC). Overall accuracy and Cohen’s κ statistics were also calculated.ResultsAll 300 images were evaluable. The model generated anatomically consistent images for Types I,II, and III (sensitivity = 1.00 for each). Specificity was 1.00 for Types I and II but 0.50 for Type III because all images requested as Types IV and V were classified as Type III. Consequently, the model failed to generate any images consistent with Type IV(arm-predominant) or Type V(calf-isolated) lipedema (sensitivity = 0.00 for both). Overall accuracy was 0.600. Unweighted and quadratic-weighted Cohen’s κ values were 0.500 and 0.667, respectively. Micro- and macro-averaged ROC AUC were both 0.750.ConclusionThe model reproduces severity gradients within lower-extremity lipedema but systematically collapses anatomically distinct subtypes into the dominant Type III phenotype, failing to depict arm-predominant and calf-isolated disease. Current generative AI systems may therefore encode lipedema as a single visual phenotype rather than a distributed anatomical entity, limiting their reliability for medical education and clinical communication.PMID:42389893 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261467340

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00266-026-06004-w. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Liposuction is a standard treatment for advanced-stage lipedema, often involving large volumes of tumescent fluid infiltration and aspiration. These shifts raise concerns about postoperative electrolyte imbalances, though systematic data are limited.METHODS: This retrospective single-center study analyzed 116 women with stage 2 or 3 lipedema who underwent liposuction between 2019 and 2023. Pre- and postoperative (within 24 hours) laboratory values including hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, and electrolytes were compared using paired t-tests, and correlations with clinical variables were assessed.RESULTS: Postoperatively, lower hemoglobin (13.6 ± 0.9 to 11.8 ± 1.2 g/dL, p < .0001) and hematocrit (40.9 ± 2.5 to 35.1 ± 3.5%, p < .0001) levels were observed, alongside higher leukocyte counts (7.6 ± 3.1 to 13.1 ± 5.9 × 109/L, p < .0001). Electrolyte shifts included higher chloride (104.7 ± 2.2 to 106.0 ± 1.9 mmol/L, p < .0001) and slightly lower calcium (2.3 ± 0.1 to 2.2 ± 0.1 mmol/L, p < .0001), sodium (140.8 ± 2.1 to 140.2 ± 2.1 mmol/L, p = .01), and potassium (4.1 ± 0.35 to 4.0 ± 0.4 mmol/L, p = .02). All parameters remained within physiological ranges and were not associated with adverse outcomes. Calcium correlated with hemoglobin (r = 0.49) and hematocrit (r = 0.51) and inversely with aspirate volume (r = -0.41, p = 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Post-liposuction electrolyte and hematologic changes are mild and clinically insignificant, reflecting predictable hemodilution rather than metabolic disturbance. Routine postoperative testing appears unnecessary for most patients, supporting selective monitoring in those with abnormal baseline values, high aspirate volumes, or relevant comorbidities.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .PMID:42377498 | DOI:10.1007/s00266-026-06004-w

Horm Metab Res. 2026 Jun 30. doi: 10.1055/a-2897-4203. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTLipedema is a chronic disorder characterized by disproportionate subcutaneous fat accumulation and pain, with an incompletely understood inflammatory component. It remains unclear whether this inflammatory profile is disease-specific or primarily driven by coexisting adiposity. This study aimed to evaluate systemic inflammatory markers in women with lipedema compared with women with obesity and normal-weight controls. This retrospective study included 229 women aged 30-65 years: 78 with lipedema, 76 with obesity without lipedema, and 75 normal-weight controls. Demographic and laboratory data were obtained from medical records. Inflammatory indices, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, and C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index, were calculated. Group comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc tests. Age was similar across groups, whereas body mass index was significantly higher in the lipedema and obesity groups than in controls (p<0.001). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, and CAR were significantly higher in both the lipedema and obesity groups compared with controls, whereas no significant differences were observed between lipedema and obesity groups. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, and C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index did not differ significantly among groups. Inflammatory indices were generally comparable across lipedema grades. These findings suggest that lipedema is associated with low-grade systemic inflammation; however, its inflammatory profile largely overlaps with obesity, indicating shared inflammatory mechanisms rather than a distinct systemic inflammatory phenotype. Among the evaluated markers, C-reactive protein-based parameters, particularly the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, appeared to better reflect inflammatory burden than hematological composite indices.PMID:42379186 | DOI:10.1055/a-2897-4203

Phlebology. 2026 Jun 25:2683555261464679. doi: 10.1177/02683555261464679. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTObjectivesThere is a deficiency in awareness and knowledge of lipedema disease among the general public and healthcare professionals. This situation may lead patients to waste time on getting the correct diagnosis and treatment. Currently, information regarding women’s awareness and knowledge level of lipedema in Turkey is limited. This study aims to examine women’s awareness, knowledge level, and desire for information concerning lipedema in Turkey.MethodsA total of 502 volunteer women participated in this online cross-sectional survey study. The survey, constructed by the authors of the study with the assistance of guidelines, systematic reviews, and current literature, consisted of sections aimed at determining demographic data, lipedema awareness, knowledge level, lipedema symptoms and suspicion, as well as individuals’ health behavior and desire for information. The primary outcome of the study was lipedema awareness, which was defined by having previously heard the term lipedema.ResultsDespite 76.1% of participants reporting awareness of lipedema, the average knowledge score about the condition was a low-to-moderate level of knowledge. The vast majority of participants (71.3%) indicated that they were willing to learn more about lipedema, and their preferred source of information was healthcare professionals (80.3%). Yet, only 19 participants (3.8%) think that lipedema is sufficiently regarded within the healthcare system.ConclusionThis study reveals that, despite relatively high awareness of lipedema among women in Turkey, the level of knowledge remains limited. The strong willingness to receive further knowledge and the preference for healthcare professionals as the principal source of information garner attention. However, the low confidence in the recognition of lipedema within the healthcare system may suggest that healthcare professionals have insufficient knowledge or do not prioritize this issue. Improving awareness and knowledge of lipedema among the public and healthcare professionals might facilitate early identification and minimize treatment delays.PMID:42348760 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261464679

Phlebology. 2026 Jun 25:2683555261464402. doi: 10.1177/02683555261464402. Online ahead of print.NO ABSTRACTPMID:42349485 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261464402

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2026 Jun 5;17:1857893. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1857893. eCollection 2026.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder with disproportionate fat accumulation in the extremities and is often misdiagnosed as obesity. Although women with lipedema appear to be metabolically distinct from body mass index (BMI)-matched controls, their fasting metabolism remains insufficiently characterized. We therefore aimed to define the metabolic signature of lipedema using serum NMR metabolomics and anthropometric profiling.METHODS: We conducted a study with 24 premenopausal women with lipedema and 21 BMI-matched controls. Fasting serum samples were analyzed using NMR spectroscopy and anthropometric data were collected. Regional body composition was additionally assessed in an exploratory matched DXA subset (n=12). To characterize coordinated metabolic differences beyond single analytes, we derived exploratory composite indices and applied multivariate analyses.RESULTS: Despite similar BMI, women with lipedema showed lower waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and lower fasting insulin than controls (age-adjusted p = 0.032). NMR profiling revealed lower alanine (p < 0.001), lactate (p = 0.004), pyruvate (p = 0.021), and elevated ketone bodies (3-hydroxybutyric acid: p = 0.009; acetoacetic acid: p = 0.035; acetone: p = 0.006). These alterations were reflected by significant group differences in composite indices for fat distribution (g = 1.26; p < 0.001), glycolysis (g = 0.74; p = 0.018), and ketone metabolism (g = 0.70; p = 0.018). Principal component analysis of the selected indices explained 78% of the total variance and showed partial group separation between lipedema and controls.CONCLUSION: Lipedema is associated with a distinct fasting metabolic profile characterized by reduced glycolytic intermediates, enhanced ketone body signals, and a more peripheral fat distribution despite comparable BMI. These findings support the concept of lipedema as a metabolically distinct phenotype and suggest that multivariate metabolic signatures may help refine future diagnostic and interventional approaches.PMID:42325630 | PMC:PMC13278978 | DOI:10.3389/fendo.2026.1857893

Phlebology. 2026 Jun 22:2683555261464406. doi: 10.1177/02683555261464406. Online ahead of print.NO ABSTRACTPMID:42332360 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261464406

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s00266-026-05988-9. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat deposition, pain, and progressive functional impairment. Although diagnosis remains primarily clinical, ultrasound has emerged as a valuable adjunctive tool for diagnosis, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative monitoring. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the current and potential applications of ultrasound throughout the entire surgical management pathway of patients with lipedema.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Articles published up to January 2026 were screened using the keywords “lipedema,” “lipoedema,” “ultrasound,” “ultrasonography,” “lipedema diagnosis,” “lipedema imaging,” “lipedema surgery,” and “liposuction.” Studies addressing ultrasound-based diagnosis, differential diagnosis, surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative monitoring in lipedema patients were included. Both original investigations and review articles published in English were considered.RESULTS: Ultrasound demonstrated significant utility across all phases of lipedema management. In the preoperative setting, it improved diagnostic accuracy by identifying characteristic sonographic features, quantifying tissue thickness, differentiating lipedema from obesity and lymphedema, and enabling vascular mapping for surgical safety. Advanced techniques, including three-dimensional ultrasound, provided additional information regarding fascial alterations, fibrosis, and fluid accumulation. Intraoperatively, ultrasound off ered real-time visualization of anatomical structures, facilitated identification of fibrotic tissue, and supported more precise liposuction by improving cannula guidance andassessment of tissue homogeneity. Postoperatively, ultrasound enabled early detection of complications such asseromas and hematomas, assessment of fi brosis and tissue remodeling, and long-term monitoring of disease recurrence or progression.DISCUSSION: The available evidence suggests that ultrasound represents a versatile, accessible, and reproducible imaging modality capable of enhancing both diagnostic and surgical aspects of lipedema care. By integrating ultrasound intopreoperative evaluation, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative follow-up, clinicians may improve surgical precision, patient safety, and treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, the current literature remains limited by heterogeneity, operator dependency, and the absence of standardized imaging protocols. Larger multicenter studiesare needed to validate diagnostic criteria and establish evidence-based guidelines for ultrasound utilization in lipedema management.CONCLUSION: Ultrasound has the potential to become an integral component of modern lipedema management. Its applications extend beyond diagnosis to encompass surgical planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative surveillance. The increasing availability of portable, high-resolution ultrasound devices may further facilitate its routine incorporation into clinical practice, ultimately contributing to safer procedures, more personalized treatment strategies, and improved long-term outcomes for patients with lipedema.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .PMID:42321448 | DOI:10.1007/s00266-026-05988-9

BMC Womens Health. 2026 Jun 20. doi: 10.1186/s12905-026-04580-2. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Lipedema is a prevalent chronic condition in women, characterized by a painful and symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue primarily in the lower limbs. Its diagnosis is based on specific clinical characteristics; however, these characteristics lack robust scientific validation. Furthermore, lipedema is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity. This study aims to compare quality of life and physical and psychological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema.METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 30 patients with obesity and lipedema (Lip-Obes group) and 29 patients with only obesity (nonLip-Obes group). Quality of life, body composition (BMI, fat free mass, fat mass, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, leg volume), pain (pain pattern, pressure pain thresholds, pain interference, pain distribution, symptoms of neuropathic pain), physical functioning (hand grip strength, quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, functional mobility and physical activity level), and psychosocial functioning (pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and stress, body image dissatisfaction, self-efficacy, and eating difficulties) were assessed using clinical measurements and self-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS: Compared to the nonLip-Obes group, the Lip-Obes group showed greater impairments in quality of life (p < 0.05). Despite similar body composition variables, the Lip-Obes group had lower waist-to-hip, waist-to-height, upper leg-to-waist, and lower leg-to-waist ratios, as well as higher total limb volume than the nonLip-Obes group. Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain intensity, lower pressure pain thresholds in the arms and legs, and greater pain interference than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). Although hand-grip strength and physical activity levels were comparable, the Lip-Obes group exhibited lower quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, and functional mobility (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain catastrophizing, greater body image dissatisfaction, and more severe eating difficulties than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, stress, or self-efficacy between groups (p > 0.05).CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional study highlights the complex nature of lipedema, providing preliminary evidence of differences in quality of life and distinct body composition and physical and physiological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. These results emphasize the need for further research to identify diagnostic biomarkers for lipedema through in-depth investigations. Future studies should also focus on developing and optimizing a multidisciplinary treatment approach tailored to the unique characteristics of patients with lipedema.PMID:42321781 | DOI:10.1186/s12905-026-04580-2

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2026 Jun 10;72(2):252-259. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2026.17048. eCollection 2026 Jun.ABSTRACTOBJECTIVES: Lipedema is a chronic condition that is often underdiagnosed. Clinical overlap with other disorders and the absence of specific diagnostic tools may delay diagnosis. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the lipedema screening questionnaire (LSQ) into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with 52 female patients diagnosed with lipedema and 49 healthy female volunteers who attended a physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic between August 2024 and January 2025. Following Beaton’s guidelines, the questionnaire was translated into Turkish and culturally adapted. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to evaluate construct validity, while Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the discriminative ability and optimal cut-off score of the questionnaire.RESULTS: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.866, and Bartlett’s test result was significant (p<0.001), supporting the suitability of the data for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis identified a two-factor structure explaining 63.5% of the total variance. CFA showed acceptable model fit (comparative fit index: 0.9668; root mean square error of approximation: 0.0782). Internal consistency was high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.866. In ROC analysis, the questionnaire demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with an area under the curve of 0.970 (95% confidence interval: 0.942-0.999; p<0.001). The optimal cut-off score was 8.5, corresponding to 90.4% sensitivity and 91.8% specificity.CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the LSQ appears to be a valid and reliable tool for the preliminary screening of individuals at risk for lipedema in clinical settings.PMID:42306004 | PMC:PMC13266626 | DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2026.17048

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s00266-026-05957-2. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: To compare central sensitization (CS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and psychosocial factors between women with lipedema and healthy controls and to identify variables associated with CS in lipedema.METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 30 women with clinically diagnosed lipedema and 30 age-matched healthy controls were assessed.CS was measured with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and PPT was recorded bilaterally at the deltoid, lateral thigh, and medial knee using an algometer, pain-related cognitions with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and mood with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).RESULTS: Compared with controls, the lipedema group had lower PPTs at all sites (all p ≤ 0.001) and higher CSI scores (p ≤ 0.001). CS prevalence (CSI ≥ 40) was 70.0% in lipedema versus 23.3% in controls (p≤ 0.001). HADS-Depression (p = 0.001), HADS-Anxiety (p = 0.017), and PCS helplessness, magnification, rumination, and total scores (all p ≤ 0.006) were higher in lipedema. In the total sample, CSI correlated negatively with all PPT values (all p ≤ 0.003) and positively with HADS-Depression/Anxiety and PCS scores (all p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis among patients with lipedema, higher CSI was associated with greater BMI (β = 1.117, p=0.018), hypertension (β = 15.918, p = 0.009), diabetes mellitus (β = 16.663, p = 0.002), higher VAS pain (β = 0.368, p = 0.002), lower right medial knee PPT (β = – 3.891, p = 0.011), and higher HADS-Depression (β = 1.307, p = 0.038).CONCLUSIONS: Lipedema is associated with lower pain thresholds and higher CS, alongside greater depressive and anxiety symptoms and pain catastrophizing. CS in lipedema appears linked to pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and cardiometabolic comorbidities. These findings suggest that management should complement peripheral approaches with strategies targeting central pain mechanisms and psychosocial factors.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .PMID:42310083 | DOI:10.1007/s00266-026-05957-2

Acta Derm Venereol. 2026 Jun 11;106:0236. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2025-0236.NO ABSTRACTPMID:42274070 | PMC:PMC13254907 | DOI:10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2025-0236

Phlebology. 2026 Jun 10:2683555261460260. doi: 10.1177/02683555261460260. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTObjectiveLipedema, which mainly affects women, is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by abnormal adipose tissue accumulation in the limbs. Despite its clinical importance, research on lipedema remains limited. Bibliometric analysis provides a quantitative way to evaluate the literature, identify trends, and assess research impact.Materials and methodsGlobal lipedema research was analyzed in the Web of Science database using the terms “lipedema”, “lipoedema”, and “lipolymphedema” for publications indexed through March 2025. Articles were classified by publication type, year, country of origin, journal quartile, and citation count. Citation analyses excluded publications from 2024 and 2025 because citation accumulation was incomplete. Only English original articles and reviews were included, while editorials, meeting abstracts, and non-indexed sources were excluded.ResultsOf 610 records identified, 382 met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified the main contributing countries and highlighted knowledge gaps and opportunities for multidisciplinary collaboration in the evolving field of lipedema research.ConclusionsThis study provides a global overview of lipedema-related research and its scholarly development. It also highlights the need for further studies on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of lipedema.PMID:42267604 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261460260

Sex Med. 2026 Jun 7;14(4):qfag041. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfag041. eCollection 2026 Aug.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder primarily affecting women, characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, pain, and reduced mobility. Its impact on sexual function remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate sexual function in women with lipedema and examine its associations with anxiety, depression, lower extremity function, and quality of life.METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 100 sexually active women were recruited: 50 with lipedema and 50 age- and Body Mass Index-matched healthy controls. Sexual function was assessed with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI); anxiety and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D); quality of life with the EuroQOL 5-Dimensional 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument; lower extremity function with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); and pain intensity with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with the total FSFI score.RESULTS: Women with lipedema had significantly lower total FSFI scores compared to controls (21.58 ± 3.99 vs. 25.86 ± 3.21, P < .001), with 76% having FSFI scores below the cut-off (≤ 26.55) compared to 36% of controls. All FSFI domain scores were significantly lower in the lipedema group (all P < .05). In the lipedema group, there was a significant correlation between total FSFI scores and age (P = .002), pain intensity (VAS; P = .022), depression (HADS-D; P = .010), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index; P = .027), and lower extremity function (LEFS; P < .001). Multiple linear regression analysis identified depression (HADS-D; P = .047), perceived health status (EQ-5D-5L VAS; P = .033), and lower extremity function (LEFS; P = .011) as independent variables that had a significant relationship with the total FSFI score.DISCUSSION: Lower sexual function is common among women with lipedema and is associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, lower extremity function, and pain intensity. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating sexual function assessment into the routine evaluation of patients with lipedema and support the need for comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment approaches addressing physical, psychological, and sexual health aspects of care.PMID:42261328 | PMC:PMC13242866 | DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfag041

Lymphat Res Biol. 2026 Jun 9:15578585261454779. doi: 10.1177/15578585261454779. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND/AIM: Although various distinctive morphological features such as hyperproliferation of adipocytes, fibrosis, and inflammation have been described in the progression of lipedema, the underlying mechanisms of these changes are not yet fully understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW) to demonstrate the role of inflammation in lipedema.METHODS: The retrospective study consisted of 60 lipedema patients (Group 1) and 40 healthy controls (Group 2). The age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of all participants were recorded, along with the lipedema type and stage for Group 1. Laboratory results, including complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), were obtained for all participants. Hemoglobin, leukocyte, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts, NLR, PLR, MPV, PDW, CRP, and ESR were evaluated.RESULTS: The mean age was 45.45 ± 10.17 years in Group 1 and 44.90 ± 10.69 years in Group 2; the BMI was 32.15 ± 5.05 in Group 1 and 30.94 ± 4.98 in Group 2, with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The most common type was Type 2 lipedema. Platelet counts, CRP, NLR, and PLR levels were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in MPV and PDW values (p > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between BMI and both leukocyte count and CRP levels (p < 0.05).CONCLUSION: In our study investigating inflammation in lipedema-an etiology that is still not fully understood-NLR, PLR, platelet count, and CRP levels were found to be significantly higher in the patient group. The increase in BMI was correlated with leukocyte count and CRP levels. This finding is important for elucidating the etiopathogenesis of the disease, and we believe it may guide future research in this area.PMID:42261591 | DOI:10.1177/15578585261454779

Phlebology. 2026 Jun 9:2683555261460252. doi: 10.1177/02683555261460252. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTObjectivesLipedema is a chronic disorder characterized by pain and disproportionate fat distribution, and its diagnosis is frequently overlooked. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the responses generated by contemporary artificial intelligence models-ChatGPT-5o, Gemini-3, and Perplexity AI-to structured clinical questions developed in accordance with the 2024 S2k Lipedema Guideline. The models were analyzed in terms of clinical accuracy, readability, and reference reliability to assess their performance in delivering guideline-based medical information.MethodsThis cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted by submitting 30 structured clinical questions, prepared on the basis of the relevant guideline, to three large language models. Responses collected on 10 February 2026, were evaluated using a seven-point Likert scale (reliability) and a five-point scale (accuracy). Text readability was assessed using six established indices, including the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Gunning Fog Index (GFOG). Reference reliability was examined by analyzing hallucination tendencies as defined in the literature.ResultsA statistically significant difference in reliability was observed among the models (p = .041); Perplexity (4.95 ± 1.20) achieved significantly higher scores than ChatGPT-5o (4.38 ± 1.05) (p = .038). In readability analyses, Perplexity (12.80 ± 2.10) required a significantly higher educational level according to FKGL scores compared to both ChatGPT-5o (p = .041) and Gemini-3 (p = .036). Regarding reference reliability, ChatGPT-5o outperformed Perplexity in source verifiability (p = .031), bibliographic precision (p = .044), and total RHS scores (p = .027), emerging as the most robust model in this domain. No statistically significant differences were found among the models in terms of clinical accuracy and usefulness (p > .05). Inter-rater agreement was excellent (Kappa: 0.92-0.97).ConclusionIn this study, ChatGPT-5o distinguished itself in reference quality, whereas Perplexity demonstrated superior reliability. However, the complex linguistic structures accompanying efforts to maintain high medical accuracy may constitute a significant barrier for individuals with limited e-health literacy. Although these systems show strong potential as medical information resources, they cannot yet replace expert physician oversight in terms of patient safety. A balanced approach between technical reliability and patient-centered simplification remains necessary.PMID:42263019 | DOI:10.1177/02683555261460252

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2026 Jul;47:347-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2026.04.009. Epub 2026 Apr 25.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Lipedema is a painful subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) disorder that mainly affects women. Patients present fat accumulation in the limbs, especially in the legs.METHODS: A pilot-controlled clinical trial was conducted on a sample of 18 patients with lipedema, equally divided into a control group (CG) and an experimental group (EG). Both groups were given 10 sessions of diathermy on the inner side of their knees, 10 min of treatment per knee. EG was given the diathermy dose at high-intensity heat, while CG was given sham treatment. Measurement instruments used were circumferential measurements, ultrasound measurements, algometry, VAS, and SF-12 questionnaire. Data were collected at baseline, at the end of the study and 5 weeks later.RESULTS: significant reductions in left knee circumference were observed in the EG compared with the CG (p = 0.004 post-intervention and p = 0.017 at follow-up). No significant differences were found in ultrasound, algometry, or VAS measurements within or between groups.CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity heat diathermy resulted in a reduction in knee circumference, suggesting a potential effect on limb volume.PMID:42264813 | DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2026.04.009

Lymphat Res Biol. 2026 Jun 8:15578585261454778. doi: 10.1177/15578585261454778. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic connective tissue disorder characterized by painful subcutaneous adipose accumulation, mainly in the lower extremities. Pain is a hallmark feature, yet its mechanisms remain poorly defined. Neuropathic components may contribute, but direct comparisons with lymphedema are scarce.METHODS: In this exploratory cross-sectional study, 118 female patients with lipedema (n = 62) or bilateral lower extremity lymphedema (n = 56) were assessed. Pain intensity was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Neuropathic pain was evaluated with painDETECT and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS). Psychological status was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), cognitive-emotional aspects with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and health-related quality of life with the WHOQOL-BREF.RESULTS: Lipedema patients reported higher pain severity (VAS 6.2 ± 1.4 vs. 5.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.02) and greater neuropathic pain prevalence (42% vs. 21%, p < 0.01) than lymphedema. painDETECT and LANSS scores were significantly higher in lipedema (p < 0.001). HADS-Anxiety (10.2 ± 3.8 vs. 7.8 ± 3.5, p = 0.005) and PCS scores (29.5 ± 7.2 vs. 25.4 ± 6.5, p = 0.03) were also elevated, while HADS-Depression was slightly higher in lymphedema without significance. WHOQOL-BREF scores were similarly reduced in both groups compared to population norms. Correlation analyses showed strong associations between pain intensity, neuropathic features, catastrophizing, and anxiety, particularly in lipedema.CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of lipedema patients exhibit neuropathic pain features and higher pain severity compared with lymphedema, while anxiety and pain catastrophizing appear to amplify symptom burden; however, quality-of-life impairment is substantial in both conditions, and the findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating with implications for more individualized management approaches.PMID:42253059 | DOI:10.1177/15578585261454778

Lymphat Res Biol. 2026 Jun 6:15578585261454789. doi: 10.1177/15578585261454789. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Recent studies have consistently shown that patients with lipedema are at a higher risk for depression and anxiety. The aim of this study is to identify the psychological factors associated with lipedema syndrome (LS) and their link to the patient’s psychological symptomatology.METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative components. The quantitative component involved anonymous online questionnaires, including a Health and Demographic Questionnaire, the body satisfaction and global self-perception questionnaire (BSGSPQ), the lymphedema quality of life questionnaire (LYMQOL), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The qualitative component consisted of oral interviews to explore the complexity of the phenomenon. Participants included those with “easy bruising,” a waist-to-hip ratio ≤0.7 (W/H), and pain levels ≥4/10 on the visual analogue scale (VAS).RESULTS: Our findings indicate that the level of depression is positively correlated with spontaneous pain (p = 0.002; r = 0.331) and the lack of medical understanding (p = 0.011; r = 0.229). Anxiety scores are inversely correlated with body satisfaction (r = -0.317) and global self-perception (r = -0.393); similarly, depression scores show similar correlations with body satisfaction (r = -0.445) and global self-perception (r = -0.608), all with p value of <0.0001.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant connections between the physical symptoms and mental health in patients with LS. The more affected the self-perception, the greater the depression and anxiety levels. These multiple contributing factors may explain the decline in quality of life (QOL) and deterioration of mental health. It is therefore crucial to proactively integrate mental health management into the care of LS patients. Future research should focus on identifying concrete, actionable methods to support women experiencing LS.PMID:42249783 | DOI:10.1177/15578585261454789

Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2026 May 28;47(3):165-173. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder predominantly affecting women, often misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Emerging evidence points to microvascular dysfunction and chronic inflammation in its pathophysiology. This study aimed to compare complete blood count (CBC) parameters and derived inflammatory indices between women with lipedema and age-matched healthy controls, focusing on the potential diagnostic value of platelet indices such as PDW and MPV.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including 45 women with clinically confirmed lipedema and 40 age matched healthy controls. CBC parameters and derived inflammatory indices were compared between groups without adjustment for body mass index (BMI).RESULTS: The study included 45 women with lipedema and 40 healthy controls with similar age distributions. No statistically significant between group differences were observed in complete blood count parameters after correction for multiple comparisons, although PDW and MPV were numerically higher in the lipedema group.CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, PDW and MPV were numerically higher in women with lipedema than in controls, but these differences lost statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons. These findings argue against PDW or MPV as standalone diagnostic markers of lipedema and indicate that future research should prioritize larger, BMI-matched cohorts and multimodal approaches that integrate platelet indices with tissue-level or imaging markers.PMID:42249859